Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18528.1155842104@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes: >> ... Red Hat's present bugzilla system >> could be described that way --- and while I can't say I'm in >> love with it, I can deal with it. > Doesn't bugzilla insist on sending you the complete bug every time? Nope, it just sends the changes/additions. Other than the lack of a direct email input method, I find BZ quite usable. Josh was just complaining that its source code is a mess (dunno, haven't looked) but other than that I think it's a definite possibility, just because so many people are already familiar with it. > Whatever system is used (if one is), there definitly needs to be some > people looking over what comes in on the mailinglists (or on IRC, for > that matter) and pipe it off to the tracker in case it's not already > there. Sure; we'd need a few volunteers handling that, no matter what software we pick. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: