Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44B3B0AF.9030404@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful
Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> >> If this is chosen as the preferred path, we could get the list bot to >> add "Reply-To: pghackers" in pgsql-patches postings to help push >> discussions there. I'd vote for doing the same in pgsql-committers, >> which also gets its share of non-null discussion content. > > that is a very easy and quick change ... but wasn't doing that brought > up before and alot of ppl were against that? > > If nobody objects within, say, the next 24 hours ... ? I'll enabled > that one both ... > Don't be surprised if there are objections - this is one of those things like emacs vs vi that stirs up religious debate. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: