Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >>
> >> If this is chosen as the preferred path, we could get the list bot to
> >> add "Reply-To: pghackers" in pgsql-patches postings to help push
> >> discussions there.  I'd vote for doing the same in pgsql-committers,
> >> which also gets its share of non-null discussion content.
> >
> > that is a very easy and quick change ... but wasn't doing that brought 
> > up before and alot of ppl were against that?
> >
> > If nobody objects within, say, the next 24 hours ... ?  I'll enabled 
> > that one both ...
> >
> 
> Don't be surprised if there are objections - this is one of those things 
> like emacs vs vi that stirs up religious debate.

If we change Reply-To:, does it prevent replies to the original author? 
If so, that seems like a problem, particularly if they are not
subscribed to the patches list.

--  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +