Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
От | Robby Russell |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44267993-3098-4517-B42A-C71CFABBDC58@planetargon.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? ("Tony Lausin" <tonylausin@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Apr 30, 2006, at 12:23 PM, Tony Lausin wrote: >> On the other hand, if you don't need multilang support, you'll find >> that postgresql is generally great to program and use. >> >> Tomislav > > Hello Tomislav, > > In my case, UTF-8 is a must. The site contextually will be directed to > North Americans, although I do anticipate that many users will from > time to time insert text in their own native languages. I myself > certainly may use non-latin characters from time to time (cyrillic), > so I find UTF-8 to be the best common bridge. > > Regards, > > Anthony Agreed, UTF-8 works fairly well. We just launched a site that has translated content for ~20 languages using a programming language that doesn't natively support unicode (Ruby... but jcode helps us out) and it works great. This is all running on PostgreSQL and we haven't seen any hiccups or complaints from people about strings not displaying right. I don't see why PostgreSQL wouldn't work for what you're working on... -Robby Robby Russell Founder & Executive Director PLANET ARGON, LLC Ruby on Rails Development, Consulting & Hosting www.planetargon.com www.robbyonrails.com +1 503 445 2457 +1 877 55 ARGON [toll free] +1 815 642 4968 [fax]
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: