Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
От | Tony Lausin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 296cdcaf0604301223u7d3c6377w73d5646707f8928@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? ("Tomi NA" <hefest@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> In my opinion, postgresql is not the way to go when building a cMS > simply because of the way it handles strings. > A CMS should be language/region agnostic i.e. supporting any chosen > locale subset, rather then just one locale, as postgresql does. You > can throw UTF-8 at the problem and it will enable data > storage/retrieval, but you'll still be stuck with incorrect text > ordering/sorting in any locale but the default. > Truth be told, I don't know of a single RDBMS which handles this issue > gracefully, but with postgresql, your basically stuck with a single > language/locale. > On the other hand, if you don't need multilang support, you'll find > that postgresql is generally great to program and use. > > Tomislav Hello Tomislav, In my case, UTF-8 is a must. The site contextually will be directed to North Americans, although I do anticipate that many users will from time to time insert text in their own native languages. I myself certainly may use non-latin characters from time to time (cyrillic), so I find UTF-8 to be the best common bridge. Regards, Anthony
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: