Re: Experts vs do-it-yourselfers
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Experts vs do-it-yourselfers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4393D5CB.4080602@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Experts vs do-it-yourselfers (nhrcommu@rochester.rr.com) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Mike, > I suggest throwing a trial balloon out there and see > if some real marketing pro's (preferably > International) grab it. Being able to say that > PostgreSQL is a "success story" is much like > PostgreSQL saying "XYZ (insert Monster company) is a > happy user". Wouldn't surprise me to see users > increase by 5x over the course of a full, > implemented year. This is a whole community of do-it-yourselfers. Actually, a marketing firm volunteered to help us a couple years back; unfortunately, the community wasn't ready to accept that kind of help and, well, the relationship ended badly. One of the big problems with that event was that there was no consensus on what we wanted the marketing firm to do and what we wanted to do ourselves. Also, they wanted to push us toward deciding on an "image" for the project at a time when a substantial minority of the community wasn't even in agreement that we needed organized PR at all. So before we started a relationship with an outside agency, we'd need to get a consensus on what we wanted them to do. Further, I tend to think that most of our limitations in marketing/PR are related to lack of manpower rather than lack of knowledge. For something (case studies, advertising, contacting users, print materials) outside marketeers could help; for other things (releases, web site, corporate relations, oss relations, "image") they could only advise us editorially; we'd still have to do the work. And professional marketeers always want to talk about the "big picture", which leads off into political debate. Add to this that PostgreSQL is supported by several companies each of whom has their own marketing and you find a project management task far beyond the bandwidth of anyone on this list. Plus, if Sun and SRA and CMD and PGInc and FJ etc. are marketing PostgreSQL, does the community really need to put a lot of effort into it? Now, some of us (mostly foundation organizers) have talked about having a PostgreSQL trade association so that the supporting companies could pour money into joint marketing of PostgreSQL. I think that would be a lot more likely to be successful than trying to form a relationship with outside marketing via this list. --Josh
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: