Re: [PATCHES] Should libedit be preferred to
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] Should libedit be preferred to |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4383E3BB.3060705@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] Should libedit be preferred to ("Chuck McDevitt" <cmcdevitt@greenplum.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] Should libedit be preferred to
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Chuck McDevitt wrote: >Another vote for libedit support... We at Greenplum definitely want to >use it. > > If we are going to move toward libedit then libedit should be included in core. Otherwise you are creating a dependency on the largest postgresql used OS (linux). The advantage here of course is that we would be able to eliminate readline support and focus only on libedit. The downside is yet another software in core. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > > -- The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: