Re: automake
От | Andreas Pflug |
---|---|
Тема | Re: automake |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 43731531.6040101@pse-consulting.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: automake (Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Dave Page wrote: > > > On 9/11/05 8:22 pm, "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> wrote: > > >>How to handle the [tar-ustar] option in configure.ac? I had to remove it >>in my setup. > > > You probably need to upgrade to automake 1.9.6. > > When I was packaging 1.4 the other night, I suddenly realised that whoever > added the slony docs ( :-p ), forgot to add them to makefile.am, so they > weren't included in the tarball. Having added them to the makefile, I > rebuilt the tarball only to get errors from tar about three of the slony > docs having too-long filenames, and find that the tarball itself way 12MB > instead of the normal 6!! > > The tar-ustar option makes tar work in a mode in which 255 character names > are supported instead of the default 99. A one off upgrade to automake on > the /older/ developer systems seemed far less pain than manually renaming > the slony docs forever more. Did that, automake works now, but Makefile will have a missing separator in line 377. automake-1.9 will claim that *.m4 is created by aclocal-1.4, but aclocal-1.9 will have throw warnings and automake-1.9 will fail then. If 1.9 is needed, it should be called explicitely in bootstrap, no? Current status: can't build on linux. automake/aclocal are 1.9.6 Regards, Andreas
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: