Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4373.1193177340@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > Anyway, is there anyone who thinks the "cycle the queue every 6 weeks or 2 > months or suitable short period" is a *bad* idea? It might be hard to pull > off, but we won't know until we try. It seems worth a try --- we can certainly abandon it easily if it doesn't work. Personally I feel every six weeks would be too short: we'd be talking only a month of work between commit-fests. I like a two-month cycle partly because it wouldn't rotate relative to the calendar: we'd always know that the first half of every odd-numbered month, or something like that, is commit-fest time. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: