Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200710241635.l9OGZ0C14292@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > > Anyway, is there anyone who thinks the "cycle the queue every 6 weeks or 2 > > months or suitable short period" is a *bad* idea? It might be hard to pull > > off, but we won't know until we try. > > It seems worth a try --- we can certainly abandon it easily if it > doesn't work. > > Personally I feel every six weeks would be too short: we'd be talking > only a month of work between commit-fests. I like a two-month cycle > partly because it wouldn't rotate relative to the calendar: we'd always > know that the first half of every odd-numbered month, or something like > that, is commit-fest time. Sounds fine to me. Basically it is a "reviewers, get your heads out of your monitors and help other patch submitters". Not a lot of additional fun for reviewers, of course, but probably necessary. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: