Re: language handlers in public schema?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: language handlers in public schema? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42BF10B7.2060907@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: language handlers in public schema? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: >Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > > >>Yeah. I think we'd need to add "where langlcallfoid != 0" so we don't >>pick up the internal/C/sql handlers. However, on closer inspection it >>appears that doind all this in pg_dump would be lots more invasive than >>I first thought. >> >> > >Why --- what else is needed beyond the addition of those clauses to the >one query? > > There are tests for both the function and the handler based on finfo->dobj.namespace->dump that inhibit output if we're in the catalog schema. If we go down this path ISTM the simplest thing would be to add a field to the FuncInfo object to allow it to be marked as a a handler/validator. Also, I think pg_dump *never* quotes the handler name or qualifies it with a schema name - that looks like it might be a bug, regardless of this. > > >>me either, but I wonder if we should provide an option on pg_dump to >>restore function handlers found in public to whatever we decide about >>the above. >> >> > >I don't see the need. If they were in public before, they can stay >there --- or the DBA can run createlang before running pg_restore to >put them where he wants. > > > > OK, I'm all for a simple life. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: