Re: language handlers in public schema?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: language handlers in public schema? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2619.1119815718@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: language handlers in public schema? (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: language handlers in public schema?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > Yeah. I think we'd need to add "where langlcallfoid != 0" so we don't > pick up the internal/C/sql handlers. However, on closer inspection it > appears that doind all this in pg_dump would be lots more invasive than > I first thought. Why --- what else is needed beyond the addition of those clauses to the one query? > me either, but I wonder if we should provide an option on pg_dump to > restore function handlers found in public to whatever we decide about > the above. I don't see the need. If they were in public before, they can stay there --- or the DBA can run createlang before running pg_restore to put them where he wants. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: