Re: Autovacuum in the backend
От | Matthew T. O'Connor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42B103A4.5000907@zeut.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Autovacuum in the backend ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Autovacuum in the backend
Re: Autovacuum in the backend |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Just my own two cents. First I am not knocking the work that has been > on autovacuum. I am sure that it was a leap on its own to get it to > work. However I will say that I just don't see the reason for it. The major reasons for autovacuum as I see it are as follows: * Reduces administrative overhead having to keep track of what tables need to be vacuumed how often. * Reduces the total amount of time the system spends vacuuming since it only vacuums when needed. * Keeps stats up-to-date automatically * Eliminates newbie confusion * Eliminates one of the criticisms that the public has against PostgreSQL (justifed or not) Also, as VACUUM improves, autovacuum will improve with it.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: