Re: Autovacuum in the backend
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42B0F8B9.30706@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Autovacuum in the backend (Russell Smith <mr-russ@pws.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: Autovacuum in the backend
Re: Autovacuum in the backend |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> The big leap will be to get it in the backend, which will as Chris KL suggested stop people shooting themselves in thefoot. > I'm not sure what strict rules are imposed by Feature freeze, but there may be time for others to make some improvementsbefore 8.1. > We have also looked at this for at least 2 releases now. If it doesn't get in now, it will just get in for 8.2 and noimprovements till 8.2. Just my own two cents. First I am not knocking the work that has been on autovacuum. I am sure that it was a leap on its own to get it to work. However I will say that I just don't see the reason for it. Vacuum especially in the 8.x series isn't that bad. Heck if you actually manage your catalog even on large databases it can be reasonable. Yes it takes a little **gasp** administrative maintenance to run vacuum at just that right time, on just those right tables but... Anyway -- it seems it may be beneficial to focus the efforts somewhere else. The only reason I wanted to know if it was going to be in the backend last week was because I needed to know if I was going to have to document in the new book. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Regards > > Russell Smith > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: