Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

Jim C. Nasby wrote:

>On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 07:29:02AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>
>>This argument doesn't hold too much weight. Namely because there are only
>>3-5 really popular languages out there. They are marketing languages.
>>The are languages you include because your database doesn't "sound"
>>complete with out them. Regardless if you can download them separately.
>>People are lazy. They don't want to download them separately.
>>
>>I see those as:
>>
>>plPgsql (for Oracle people)
>>plPerl
>>plPHP
>>
>>
>
>What databases support perl or php stored procs/functions? Or python for
>that matter?
>
>
None on the server side (except PostgreSQL) which makes the
argument all that more powerful :)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake





--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL