Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050404004151.GV53309@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 07:29:02AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > This argument doesn't hold too much weight. Namely because there are only > 3-5 really popular languages out there. They are marketing languages. > The are languages you include because your database doesn't "sound" > complete with out them. Regardless if you can download them separately. > People are lazy. They don't want to download them separately. > > I see those as: > > plPgsql (for Oracle people) > plPerl > plPHP What databases support perl or php stored procs/functions? Or python for that matter? -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: