Re: Versioned vs unversioned jarfile names?
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Versioned vs unversioned jarfile names? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41F53603.50402@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Versioned vs unversioned jarfile names? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
We could certainly provide symlinks with specific information. We do have an interesting problem that most others don't ie API versions. How about publishing them to jpackage.org ? Dave Tom Lane wrote: >I have a request filed here: >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=145744 >to supply version-less symlinks for the JDBC jarfiles that are >distributed in the Postgres RPMs. Does anyone have a comment >on whether this is a good or bad idea? > >I personally thought that it would be better to use names that aren't >totally versionless, but include some sort of major version number that >indicates API level, or something like that. But I don't know what >would be appropriate. Thoughts welcome. > > regards, tom lane > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend > > > > -- Dave Cramer http://www.postgresintl.com 519 939 0336 ICQ#14675561
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: