Versioned vs unversioned jarfile names?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Versioned vs unversioned jarfile names?
Дата
Msg-id 22675.1106588112@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Versioned vs unversioned jarfile names?
Re: Versioned vs unversioned jarfile names?
Список pgsql-jdbc
I have a request filed here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=145744
to supply version-less symlinks for the JDBC jarfiles that are
distributed in the Postgres RPMs.  Does anyone have a comment
on whether this is a good or bad idea?

I personally thought that it would be better to use names that aren't
totally versionless, but include some sort of major version number that
indicates API level, or something like that.  But I don't know what
would be appropriate.  Thoughts welcome.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Barry Lind"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PGResultSetMetaData
Следующее
От: Dave Cramer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Versioned vs unversioned jarfile names?