Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41EFC3C0.6080903@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering (Hervé Piedvache <herve@elma.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hervé Piedvache wrote: >Dear community, > >My company, which I actually represent, is a fervent user of PostgreSQL. >We used to make all our applications using PostgreSQL for more than 5 years. >We usually do classical client/server applications under Linux, and Web >interface (php, perl, C/C++). We used to manage also public web services with >10/15 millions records and up to 8 millions pages view by month. > > Depending on your needs either: Slony: www.slony.info or Replicator: www.commandprompt.com Will both do what you want. Replicator is easier to setup but Slony is free. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake >Now we are in front of a new need, but we do not find any good solution with >PostgreSQL. >We need to make a sort of directory of millions of data growing about 4/8 >millions per month, and to be able to be used by many users from the web. In >order to do this, our solution need to be able to run perfectly with many >insert and many select access (done before each insert, and done by web site >visitors). We will also need to make a search engine for the millions of data >(140/150 millions records at the immediate beginning) ... No it's not google, >but the kind of volume of data stored in the main table is similar. > >Then ... we have made some tests, with the actual servers we have here, like a >Bi-Pro Xeon 2.8 Ghz, with 4 Gb of RAM and the result of the cumulative >inserts, and select access is slowing down the service really quickly ... >(Load average is going up to 10 really quickly on the database). > >We were at this moment thinking about a Cluster solution ... We saw on the >Internet many solution talking about Cluster solution using MySQL ... but >nothing about PostgreSQL ... the idea is to use several servers to make a >sort of big virtual server using the disk space of each server as one, and >having the ability to use the CPU and RAM of each servers in order to >maintain good service performance ...one can imagin it is like a GFS but >dedicated to postgreSQL... > >Is there any solution with PostgreSQL matching these needs ... ? >Do we have to backport our development to MySQL for this kind of problem ? >Is there any other solution than a Cluster for our problem ? > >Looking for your reply, > >Regards, > > -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
Вложения
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: