Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
От | Hervé Piedvache |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200501201600.47583.herve@elma.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Joshua, Le Jeudi 20 Janvier 2005 15:44, Joshua D. Drake a écrit : > Hervé Piedvache wrote: > > > >My company, which I actually represent, is a fervent user of PostgreSQL. > >We used to make all our applications using PostgreSQL for more than 5 > > years. We usually do classical client/server applications under Linux, > > and Web interface (php, perl, C/C++). We used to manage also public web > > services with 10/15 millions records and up to 8 millions pages view by > > month. > > Depending on your needs either: > > Slony: www.slony.info > > or > > Replicator: www.commandprompt.com > > Will both do what you want. Replicator is easier to setup but > Slony is free. No ... as I have said ... how I'll manage a database getting a table of may be 250 000 000 records ? I'll need incredible servers ... to get quick access or index reading ... no ? So what we would like to get is a pool of small servers able to make one virtual server ... for that is called a Cluster ... no ? I know they are not using PostgreSQL ... but how a company like Google do to get an incredible database in size and so quick access ? regards, -- Hervé Piedvache Elma Ingénierie Informatique 6 rue du Faubourg Saint-Honoré F-75008 - Paris - France Pho. 33-144949901 Fax. 33-144949902
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: