Re: Installing PostgreSQL as "postgress" versus "root" Debate!

Darcy Buskermolen wrote:

>On January 12, 2005 04:31 pm, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>
>>Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Tomeh, Husam wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I've seen book that prefer installing PostgreSQL as root and another
>>>>one recommends otherwise by first creating a postgres account and
>>>>then installing it as postgres. In the Oracle world, you don't use
>>>>root to install the software. What is the best practice as far as
>>>>PostgreSQL goes?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>The current recommendation, which is reflected in the installation
>>>instructions, is to install the software as root and to use the
>>>postgres user for the database files.  The advice seen elsewhere in
>>>this thread to use the postgres user also for the software files is
>>>wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>If the user owns the catalog, there is no reason for that user to not
>>also own the files.
>>
>>Sincerely,
>>
>>Joshua D. Drake
>>
>>
>
>Isn't there a requiremnet of writing libpq.so to a location that ldconfig can
>make use of it?  By default FreeBSD won't let you ldconfig a file that isn't
>owned by root (or that is in a directory that is writeable by anybody other
>than members of group 0).
>
>
Now that is interesting. That is not a problem on Linux. I didn't
know that FreeBSD was like that.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



>
>
>
>


--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL