Re: Installing PostgreSQL as "postgress" versus "root" Debate!
От | Darcy Buskermolen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Installing PostgreSQL as "postgress" versus "root" Debate! |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200501121650.58255.darcy@wavefire.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Installing PostgreSQL as "postgress" versus "root" Debate! ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Installing PostgreSQL as "postgress" versus "root" Debate!
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On January 12, 2005 04:31 pm, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Tomeh, Husam wrote: > >>I've seen book that prefer installing PostgreSQL as root and another > >>one recommends otherwise by first creating a postgres account and > >>then installing it as postgres. In the Oracle world, you don't use > >>root to install the software. What is the best practice as far as > >>PostgreSQL goes? > > > > The current recommendation, which is reflected in the installation > > instructions, is to install the software as root and to use the > > postgres user for the database files. The advice seen elsewhere in > > this thread to use the postgres user also for the software files is > > wrong. > > If the user owns the catalog, there is no reason for that user to not > also own the files. > > Sincerely, > > Joshua D. Drake Isn't there a requiremnet of writing libpq.so to a location that ldconfig can make use of it? By default FreeBSD won't let you ldconfig a file that isn't owned by root (or that is in a directory that is writeable by anybody other than members of group 0). -- Darcy Buskermolen Wavefire Technologies Corp. ph: 250.717.0200 fx: 250.763.1759 http://www.wavefire.com
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: