Re: UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32
От | Roland Volkmann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41D5B603.80800@gmx.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Hello, Tom Lane schrieb am 31.12.2004 20:21: > "Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes: > >>We know it's broken and won't be fixed for 8.0. > > >>If we just #ifndef WIN32 the definitions in utils/mb/encnames.c it won't >>be possible to select that encoding, right? Will that have any other >>unwanted effects (such as breaking client encodings)? If not, I suggest >>this is done. > > > I believe the subscripts in those arrays have to match the encoding > enum type, so you can't just ifdef out individual entries. > > >>(Or perhaps something can be done in pg_valid_server_encoding?) > > > Making the valid_server_encoding function reject it might work. > Tatsuo-san would know for sure. > > Should we also reject it as a client encoding, or does that work OK? what ever you will decide to do, please don't reject UTF-8 as a valid client encoding. This would break existing applications in our company, and I'm sure, not only there. With best regards, Roland.
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: