Re: UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 11457.1104520876@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32
Re: UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 |
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes: > We know it's broken and won't be fixed for 8.0. > If we just #ifndef WIN32 the definitions in utils/mb/encnames.c it won't > be possible to select that encoding, right? Will that have any other > unwanted effects (such as breaking client encodings)? If not, I suggest > this is done. I believe the subscripts in those arrays have to match the encoding enum type, so you can't just ifdef out individual entries. > (Or perhaps something can be done in pg_valid_server_encoding?) Making the valid_server_encoding function reject it might work. Tatsuo-san would know for sure. Should we also reject it as a client encoding, or does that work OK? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: