Re: postgres uptime
От | Gaetano Mendola |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres uptime |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 412719D1.3030204@bigfoot.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgres uptime (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tom Lane wrote: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com> writes: | |>>I think we should just call gettimeofday() at postmaster start and store |>>it somewhere. | | |>Isn't the shared memory a good place ? | | | Depends. Do you want to reset it during a backend-crash-recovery cycle? | You'll have to, if it's only stored in shared memory. Depending on what | your definition of "uptime" is, that could be a reasonable thing to do, | or not. | | There's been a remarkable lack of discussion about exactly what this | number would mean, anyway. Does "postmaster start" mean postmaster | process start? Or when we are first ready to receive a connection? | There could be a *very* large difference, in the case of a hot-standby | postmaster. Speaking of my needs I wish to have the time when the server was able to accept connections and if the backend do a crash-recovery cicle we can have a GUC, similar to statistics reset, in order to have an uptime reset or not. Regards Gaetano Mendola -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBJxnQ7UpzwH2SGd4RAoi6AJ4sm64TNT8SCGvkoaEaN9f82RFS4wCgiq0L MrCYrpKNA7AKT1k+jRoypgQ= =ezvn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: