Re: postgres uptime
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres uptime |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16688.1093048522@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgres uptime (Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgres uptime
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com> writes: >> I think we should just call gettimeofday() at postmaster start and store >> it somewhere. > Isn't the shared memory a good place ? Depends. Do you want to reset it during a backend-crash-recovery cycle? You'll have to, if it's only stored in shared memory. Depending on what your definition of "uptime" is, that could be a reasonable thing to do, or not. There's been a remarkable lack of discussion about exactly what this number would mean, anyway. Does "postmaster start" mean postmaster process start? Or when we are first ready to receive a connection? There could be a *very* large difference, in the case of a hot-standby postmaster. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: