Re: logfile subprocess and Fancy File Functions
От | Andreas Pflug |
---|---|
Тема | Re: logfile subprocess and Fancy File Functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40FD1D6B.8090405@pse-consulting.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: logfile subprocess and Fancy File Functions (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: logfile subprocess and Fancy File Functions
Re: logfile subprocess and Fancy File Functions |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Andreas Pflug wrote: > >> > > Very nice. You did a nice trick of reading the log filenames into a > timestamp field: > > count = sscanf(de->d_name, "%04d-%02d-%02d_%02d%02d%02d_%05d.log", &yea$ > > You only process files that match that pattern for pg_logfiles_ls() > (perhaps this should be pg_logdir_ls for consistency). Yup. And you can then > process the timestamp field in queries. Good idea. What happens if a > filename matches the above pattern but isn't a valid timestamp? Does > the function fail? Right now, BuildTupleFromCString will fail for invalid timestamps. I'm going to change that to pgsql's internal function (strptime seems a bad idea though). > > My only question is whether we need to allow a custom prefix for the > log filenames so they can be distinguished from other file names in a > user-supplied log directory, like /var/log, or would they always go into > a separate directory under there. I think a prefix would be nice. How should the prefix be named? pgsql_ ? > > Of course this needs docs but I assume you are waiting to see it applied > first. Not necessarily, but I'd like names etc. fixed before. Regards, Andreas
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: