Re: logfile subprocess and Fancy File Functions
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: logfile subprocess and Fancy File Functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200407200339.i6K3d0Y12516@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: logfile subprocess and Fancy File Functions (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: logfile subprocess and Fancy File Functions
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Andreas Pflug wrote: > Updated patch which leaves postmaster runnable after the syslogger > terminated due to pipe problems. Very nice. You did a nice trick of reading the log filenames into a timestamp field: count = sscanf(de->d_name, "%04d-%02d-%02d_%02d%02d%02d_%05d.log", &yea$ You only process files that match that pattern for pg_logfiles_ls() (perhaps this should be pg_logdir_ls for consistency). And you can then process the timestamp field in queries. Good idea. What happens if a filename matches the above pattern but isn't a valid timestamp? Does the function fail? My only question is whether we need to allow a custom prefix for the log filenames so they can be distinguished from other file names in a user-supplied log directory, like /var/log, or would they always go into a separate directory under there. I think a prefix would be nice. Of course this needs docs but I assume you are waiting to see it applied first. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: