Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER
От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40BDEA2C.5000503@familyhealth.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER
Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Well, the spec doesn't have create permissions per se, but they do have > a "usage" right on domains, and they specify that revoking that results > in dropping objects: > > 7) For every abandoned domain descriptor DO, let S1.DN be the > <domain name> of DO. The following <drop domain statement> is > effectively executed without further Access Rule checking: > > DROP DOMAIN S1.DN CASCADE Hmmm. Seems pretty harsh. But barring us implementing that (I don't see it happening for 7.5), just had an idea :) How about pg_dumpall dumps all users as superusers, and then changes them back to what they're supposed to be at the bottom of the script :) Easy :) Chris
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: