Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040602151338.GA8754@dcc.uchile.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 10:54:36PM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > >Well, the spec doesn't have create permissions per se, but they do have > >a "usage" right on domains, and they specify that revoking that results > >in dropping objects: > > > > 7) For every abandoned domain descriptor DO, let S1.DN be the > > <domain name> of DO. The following <drop domain statement> is > > effectively executed without further Access Rule checking: > > > > DROP DOMAIN S1.DN CASCADE > > Hmmm. Seems pretty harsh. But barring us implementing that (I don't > see it happening for 7.5), just had an idea :) > > How about pg_dumpall dumps all users as superusers, and then changes > them back to what they're supposed to be at the bottom of the script :) Huh, how about a GUC var, say "creating_user", which would make objects created by the superuser as created by whoever is mentioned there? The dump connects only as superuser and changes creating_user as needed. Not a pretty idea, but weren't you looking for kludges? :-) -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>) "La persona que no quería pecar / estaba obligada a sentarse en duras y empinadas sillas / desprovistas, por cierto de blandos atenuantes" (Patricio Vogel)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: