Re: [ADMIN] postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [ADMIN] postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4089.1200550374@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [ADMIN] postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal
Re: [ADMIN] postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > mischa_sandberg@telus.net (Mischa Sandberg) writes: >> Unfortunately, with multiple jails running PG servers and (due to app >> limitations) all servers having same PGPORT, you get the situation that >> when jail#2 (,jail#3,...) server comes up, it: >> - detects that there is a shm seg with ipc key 5432001 >> - checks whether the associated postmaster process exists (with kill -0) >> - overwrites the segment created and being used by jail #1 > Easiest fix: change the UID of the user running the postmaster (ie. pgsql) so > that each runs as a distinct UID (instead of distinct PGPORT) ... been doing > this since moving to FreeBSD 6.x ... no patches required ... Sure, but in the spirit of "belt and suspenders too", I'd think that doing that *and* something like Mischa's proposal wouldn't be bad. (BTW, as far as I saw the original post only went to -hackers ... there's something messed up about your reply.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: