Re: [ADMIN] postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [ADMIN] postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080117143729.GR5031@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [ADMIN] postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [ADMIN] postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > > Easiest fix: change the UID of the user running the postmaster (ie. pgsql) so > > that each runs as a distinct UID (instead of distinct PGPORT) ... been doing > > this since moving to FreeBSD 6.x ... no patches required ... > > Sure, but in the spirit of "belt and suspenders too", I'd think that > doing that *and* something like Mischa's proposal wouldn't be bad. I agree that we should try to be careful about stepping on segments that might still be in use, but I would also discourage jail users from using the same uid for multiple PG clusters since the jail doesn't protect the shmem segment. We use seperate uids even w/ linux-vservers where shmem and everything *is* seperate, following the same 'belt and suspenders too' spirit for security. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: