Re: Socket communication for contrib

Tom Lane wrote:
> Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres@cybertec.at> writes:
> 
>>Nested transactions: I don't think nested transactions will really help 
>>to resolve the core problem. Committing a subtransaction will most 
>>likely not imply that a parent transaction can be committed as well.
> 
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> 
>>As I said: Some people MIGHT find it useful in some special cases.
>>If the community decides that it does not enough sense to integrate it 
>>into contrib I can live with that.
> 
> 
> I won't take a position on whether it's useful enough to put in contrib,
> but if people want it there, I'd just ask that the README be extended to
> point out the transactional risks.

this should not be a problem.
I can intregrate all necessary information there.

folks, let's do a poll ...
who is for it - who is against it ...
regards,
    Hans


-- 
Cybertec Geschwinde u Schoenig
Schoengrabern 134, A-2020 Hollabrunn, Austria
Tel: +43/2952/30706 or +43/664/233 90 75
www.cybertec.at, www.postgresql.at, kernel.cybertec.at