Re: Socket communication for contrib

Hans-J�rgen Sch�nig wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres@cybertec.at> writes:
> > 
> >>Nested transactions: I don't think nested transactions will really help 
> >>to resolve the core problem. Committing a subtransaction will most 
> >>likely not imply that a parent transaction can be committed as well.
> > 
> > 
> > Agreed.
> > 
> > 
> >>As I said: Some people MIGHT find it useful in some special cases.
> >>If the community decides that it does not enough sense to integrate it 
> >>into contrib I can live with that.
> > 
> > 
> > I won't take a position on whether it's useful enough to put in contrib,
> > but if people want it there, I'd just ask that the README be extended to
> > point out the transactional risks.
> 
> this should not be a problem.
> I can intregrate all necessary information there.
> 
> folks, let's do a poll ...
> who is for it - who is against it ...

Is it better in /contrib or gborg?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073