Re: [pgsql-advocacy] SQL Spec Compliance Questions
| От | Joe Conway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] SQL Spec Compliance Questions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 406D9943.8070401@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | SQL Spec Compliance Questions (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] SQL Spec Compliance Questions
|
| Список | pgsql-sql |
Josh Berkus wrote: >>4.16.2 Referenceable tables, subtables, and supertables >> A table BT whose row type is derived from a structured type ST is >> called a typed table. Only a base table or a view can be a typed >> table. A typed table has columns corresponding, in name and >> declared type, to every attribute of ST and one other column REFC >> that is the self-referencing column of BT; let REFCN be the >> >>I really don't quite understand this, but I don't think we have it ;-) > Was the SQL99 Committee smoking crack, or what? What the heck is that > *for*? After re-reading it, I think it is related to (or at least similar to) the work Tom is currently doing to allow composite types as table attributes. Joe
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: