Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1129.1080928076@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SQL Spec Compliance Questions (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes: >>> 4.16.2 Referenceable tables, subtables, and supertables >>> A table BT whose row type is derived from a structured type ST is >>> called a typed table. Only a base table or a view can be a typed >>> table. A typed table has columns corresponding, in name and >>> declared type, to every attribute of ST and one other column REFC >>> that is the self-referencing column of BT; let REFCN be the > After re-reading it, I think it is related to (or at least similar to) > the work Tom is currently doing to allow composite types as table > attributes. The "structured type" stuff seems closely related, but I do not understand the business about a "self-referencing column". I have a feeling that it might be a mutant version of our notion of inheritance ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: