Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org

Dave Page wrote: <blockquote cite="mid03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F68E@mail.vale-housing.co.uk" type="cite"><pre
wrap="">
 
 </pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Pflug [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de">mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de</a>]
 
Sent: 12 March 2004 13:57
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:josh@agliodbs.com">josh@agliodbs.com</a>
Cc: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org">pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org</a>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org


Isn't gforge a pgsql related project itself?
So I'd suggest:

<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.postgresql.org">www.postgresql.org</a>   -> main PostgreSQL
site
gforge.postgresql.org -> gforge interface site 
<projectname>.postgresql.org -> gforge hosted projects   </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">
The problem with that approach is that our 'official' sites then get
lost amongst the project sites.

We need some distinction between the core project sites and other
project sites - istm that a different domain is the only way to do that.
 </pre></blockquote><br /> (breaking previous rule) I agree.<br /><br /> Also, the gforge people would prefer us *not*
touse a name that includes gforge, because of the risk of confusion. That's how we came up with "pgfoundry" in the
firstplace.<br /><br /> cheers<br /><br /> andrew<br />