Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F68E@mail.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de] > Sent: 12 March 2004 13:57 > To: josh@agliodbs.com > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org > > > Isn't gforge a pgsql related project itself? > So I'd suggest: > > www.postgresql.org -> main PostgreSQL site > gforge.postgresql.org -> gforge interface site > <projectname>.postgresql.org -> gforge hosted projects The problem with that approach is that our 'official' sites then get lost amongst the project sites. We need some distinction between the core project sites and other project sites - istm that a different domain is the only way to do that. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: