Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4046.957282753@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: >> A while ago while thinking about a way to make ipcclean better I thunk >> that perhaps the postmaster should write the keys of the segments it gets >> to a flat-text file. > Hmm. Could we write this to a separate shared memory segment? Much > more likely to be of fixed length and compatible between versions, and > more likely to exist or not exist with the same behavior as the large > shared memory segment under discussion?? What happens if you get a key collision with some other application for that segment? Seems to me that using shmem to remember where you put your shmem segments is dangerously circular ;-) The flat text file is not a bad idea, but I think the logic I suggested yesterday makes it unnecessary... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: