Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 390EB439.E42750F6@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea (Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE>) |
Ответы |
Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea
Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> A while ago while thinking about a way to make ipcclean better I thunk > that perhaps the postmaster should write the keys of the segments it gets > to a flat-text file. If it somehow crashes and loses track of what it > allocated before it can use that information to clean up. Not sure how > often that would take effect but it's very socially friendly. Hmm. Could we write this to a separate shared memory segment? Much more likely to be of fixed length and compatible between versions, and more likely to exist or not exist with the same behavior as the large shared memory segment under discussion?? - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: