Re: field must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used
От | Mike Mascari |
---|---|
Тема | Re: field must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 403F75F9.5040904@mascari.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | field must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in an aggregate function? (Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: field must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used
Re: field must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used |
Список | pgsql-general |
Bill Moran wrote: > Hey all. > > I've hit an SQL problem that I'm a bit mystified by. I have two different > questions regarding this problem: why? and how do I work around it? > > The following query: > > SELECT GCP.id, > GCP.Name > FROM Gov_Capital_Project GCP, > WHERE TLM.TLI_ID = $2 > group by GCP.id > ORDER BY gcp.name; > > Produces the following error: > > ERROR: column "gcp.name" must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used > in an aggregate function The reason the grouping requires either an attribute to be aggregated or apart of the group by list is that if it were not, an arbitrary value would have to be selected: [test@lexus] select * from projects; dept | project -----------+-------------- Finance | Y2K Corporate | Y2K Corporate | Annual Audit (3 rows) [test@lexus] select dept, project from projects group by dept; ERROR: column "projects.project" must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in an aggregate function If this were to be permitted, which project should be selected, 'Y2K' or 'Annual Audit'? [test@lexus] select dept, project from projects group by dept, project; dept | project -----------+-------------- Corporate | Y2K Corporate | Annual Audit Finance | Y2K (3 rows) Of course, this has little meaning without an aggregate. All you're doing is leveraging GROUP BY's sort. You might as well use DISTINCT. More useful would be: [test@lexus] select dept, count(project) from projects group by dept; dept | count -----------+------- Finance | 1 Corporate | 2 (2 rows) or perhaps: [test@lexus] select count(dept), project from projects group by project; count | project -------+-------------- 2 | Y2K 1 | Annual Audit > This isn't my query, I'm translating a system prototyped in MSSQL to > Postgres. This query _does_ work in MSSQL. Does that constitute a > bug in MSSQL, or a shortcomming of Postgres, or just a difference of > interpretation? If MSSQL picks an arbitrary value for the non-group by attribute, it is violating spec. Mike Mascari
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: