field must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in an aggregate function?
От | Bill Moran |
---|---|
Тема | field must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in an aggregate function? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 403F6C30.1060304@potentialtech.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: field must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used
Re: field must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used Re: field must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used Re: field must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in an aggregate function? |
Список | pgsql-general |
Hey all. I've hit an SQL problem that I'm a bit mystified by. I have two different questions regarding this problem: why? and how do I work around it? The following query: SELECT GCP.id, GCP.Name FROM Gov_Capital_Project GCP, WHERE TLM.TLI_ID = $2 group by GCP.id ORDER BY gcp.name; Produces the following error: ERROR: column "gcp.name" must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in an aggregate function That field is a CHAR, so I'm not sure what kind of aggregate to use, or (more important to my understanding) why one is necessary. As I said, I'm not sure I understand why this occurs. I'm assuming that I don't understand "group by" as well as I thought I did ;) This isn't my query, I'm translating a system prototyped in MSSQL to Postgres. This query _does_ work in MSSQL. Does that constitute a bug in MSSQL, or a shortcomming of Postgres, or just a difference of interpretation? -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: