Re: postgreSQL licenseing
От | Alex Satrapa |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgreSQL licenseing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 403E7180.5050706@lintelsys.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgreSQL licenseing (David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
David Garamond wrote: > Which of the following count as "accessible in a reasonable way"? The usual means that I have seen of making copyright licences accessible are to: 1) List all copyright clauses in the manual, under a single chapter. This is effectively an inventory of the licenced worksused in the product. 2) List all copyright clauses in a file such as "licences.txt", which is also an inventory of licenced works used in theproduct. 3) Display all copyright clauses in the log file of a daemon. 4) Display the copyright clauses in the scrolling portion of a splash screen (ick!) or in the Help->About screen of a GUI Having the licence hidden somewhere - eg as unused strings in a binary - doesn't seem to me to be "accessible in a reasonableway". Would you feel it was reasonable for a vendor to publish the instruction manual in this way? Just by two bits worth Alex Satrapa
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: