Re: postgreSQL licenseing
От | David Garamond |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgreSQL licenseing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 403E15C3.3050607@zara.6.isreserved.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgreSQL licenseing (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgreSQL licenseing
Re: postgreSQL licenseing |
Список | pgsql-general |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>1) If we just ship the PostgreSQL binaries in our product(without >>source code), do we need to include the BSD licence text anywhere? > > Yes. The license says "... provided that the above copyright notice and > this paragraph and the following two paragraphs appear in all copies." > Note that it doesn't say "provided that the notice is displayed in > annoying ways", but it needs to be accessible in reasonable ways. Which of the following count as "accessible in a reasonable way"? 1. in a separate text file, by itself (ala GPL's COPYING), but quite deep within several levels of subdirectories (e.g. under bin/ or etc/misc/license/). 2. in a binary (e.g. postgres.exe), that is, we modified the source code slightly so that the copyright text is embedded in the final executable. The executable is not compressed, so a "strings postgres" command could view the copyright text. 3. in a separate program file (which is included along with postgres in the distribution), in the Help > About menu or the splash screen, e.g. "Portions of this program are licensed under the BSD License: PostgreSQL, ..." 4. Only the URL to the license text is displayed, e.g. http://www.mydomain.com/etc/license/BSD.txt. -- dave
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: