Re: Streaming replication on win32, still broken
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Streaming replication on win32, still broken |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3f0b79eb1002162307g552cd8ecv43282ba814c87246@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Streaming replication on win32, still broken (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 06:55, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >>> 2. Straightforwardly observe the alignment rule. Since the received WAL >>> data might start at the middle of WAL block, walreceiver needs to keep >>> the last half-written WAL block for alignment. OTOH since the received >>> data might end at the middle of WAL block, walreceiver needs zero-padding. >>> As a result, walreceiver writes the set of the last WAL block, received >>> data and zero-padding. > >> May there be other reasons to d this as well? > > Writing misaligned data is certain to be expensive even when it works... Yeah, right. After I remove O_DIRECT, I'll change walreceiver so as to do an alignment correctly, and then I'll test the performance. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: