Re: Streaming replication on win32, still broken
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Streaming replication on win32, still broken |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20027.1266388037@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Streaming replication on win32, still broken (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Streaming replication on win32, still broken
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 06:55, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2. Straightforwardly observe the alignment rule. Since the received WAL
>> � data might start at the middle of WAL block, walreceiver needs to keep
>> � the last half-written WAL block for alignment. OTOH since the received
>> � data might end at the middle of WAL block, walreceiver needs zero-padding.
>> � As a result, walreceiver writes the set of the last WAL block, received
>> � data and zero-padding.
> May there be other reasons to d this as well?
Writing misaligned data is certain to be expensive even when it works...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: