Re: DTrace probes patch
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DTrace probes patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3f0b79eb0812171926p6f7d5623rbacb9cf769fd36e0@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DTrace probes patch (Robert Lor <Robert.Lor@Sun.COM>) |
Ответы |
Re: DTrace probes patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 4:49 AM, Robert Lor <Robert.Lor@sun.com> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> >> But there are 5 callers of XLogWrite ... why aren't the other ones being >> tracked too? >> >> > > This probe originally came from Simon, so it can't possibly be wrong :-) > > My understanding is that we only want to track the XLogWrite when advancing > to the next buffer page, and if there is unwritten data in the new buffer > page, that indicates no more empty WAL buffer pages available, but I may be > wrong. I did some tests by adjusting wal_buffers, and I could observe this > behavior, more calls to XLogWrite with smaller wal_buffers. I understood your intention. But, I think that its function name is somewhat confusing. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: