Re: DTrace probes patch
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DTrace probes patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25553.1229610862@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DTrace probes patch ("Fujii Masao" <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: DTrace probes patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Fujii Masao" <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 4:49 AM, Robert Lor <Robert.Lor@sun.com> wrote: >> My understanding is that we only want to track the XLogWrite when advancing >> to the next buffer page, and if there is unwritten data in the new buffer >> page, that indicates no more empty WAL buffer pages available, but I may be >> wrong. I did some tests by adjusting wal_buffers, and I could observe this >> behavior, more calls to XLogWrite with smaller wal_buffers. > I understood your intention. But, I think that its function name is somewhat > confusing. I agree. If the probe is meant to track only *some* WAL writes then it needs to be named something less generic than TRACE_POSTGRESQL_WAL_BUFFER_WRITE. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: