Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC
От | Gaetano Mendola |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3FC3AFE7.6060808@bigfoot.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC ("Sander Steffann" <steffann@nederland.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Sander Steffann wrote: > Hi, > > >>>this are the rpm for 9.0: >>>3768418 Nov 24 10:07 postgresql-7.4-0.3PGDG.i386.rpm >> >>>and this for rhas-2.1: >>>2080872 Nov 24 10:08 postgresql-7.4-0.3PGDG.i386.rpm >> >>>how you can see the sizes are completely different. >>>Am I missing something ? >> >>Compiler version and flags. Although that is a substantial difference. > > The > >>rhas-2.1 compiler is the Red Hat gcc 2.96, and the RH9 compiler is gcc 3. >>Apparently gcc 3 generates large code. Sander, can you verify this, since >>you built both of these? > > > The file sizes are correct. I can't explain the huge difference though... > They both contain the same files, and are built from the same specfile. The > only difference between the build commands is that the RedHat 9 RPMs are > built with --define 'build89 1', and the RHEL RPMs are built with --define > 'build7x 1' and --define 'plperl 0'. The exclusion of plperl shouldn't make > a difference in this RPM, only in the postgresql-pl RPM... > > In short: both filesizes are correct, and I can't explain it :( > Sander. However 6MB of difference for postgresql-server-7.4-0.3PGDG.i386.rpm and 2.2 MB for postgresql-contrib-7.4-0.3PGDG.i386.rpm are too much ! I'd like to have time to dig on it... Regards Gaetano Mendola
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: