Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC
От | Sander Steffann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 001201c3b390$84949b60$64c8a8c0@10ww.steffann.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC (Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi, > > this are the rpm for 9.0: > > 3768418 Nov 24 10:07 postgresql-7.4-0.3PGDG.i386.rpm > > > and this for rhas-2.1: > > 2080872 Nov 24 10:08 postgresql-7.4-0.3PGDG.i386.rpm > > > how you can see the sizes are completely different. > > Am I missing something ? > > Compiler version and flags. Although that is a substantial difference. The > rhas-2.1 compiler is the Red Hat gcc 2.96, and the RH9 compiler is gcc 3. > Apparently gcc 3 generates large code. Sander, can you verify this, since > you built both of these? The file sizes are correct. I can't explain the huge difference though... They both contain the same files, and are built from the same specfile. The only difference between the build commands is that the RedHat 9 RPMs are built with --define 'build89 1', and the RHEL RPMs are built with --define 'build7x 1' and --define 'plperl 0'. The exclusion of plperl shouldn't make a difference in this RPM, only in the postgresql-pl RPM... In short: both filesizes are correct, and I can't explain it :( Sander.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: